Marco is pretty much spot on. If you have a "proof" without the proper measurable colorbars, then it's not a proof at all. Kind of surpised that the color bars don't fit your eXact.
The Alpha_Gracol_G7 sounds like a home made printer profile and not an output destination target. While that may be fine and dandy, it's not enough info to go in.
At the end of the day, they client is still expecting the final product to look like their provided print and you will probably end up tweaking the file until you get a reasonable result. Sadly, this happens all too often but we, as print providers, will do what it takes to make our clients happy. Hopefully you can charge them accordingly.
I also do my best to educate them on what a proper proof is and how important proper lighting is as well (especially when it comes to digital litho presses). I also offer to make the proof myself as I know that it's tied into my printing system pretty well.
------------------------------
Brian Tickenoff
PrePress Manager
Coyle Reproductions Inc.
Brea CA
(866) 269-5373
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 04-30-2021 10:31 AM
From: Marco Ugolini
Subject: Customer Supplied Proof
Hi Jesse.
What some people decide to call a "proof" may actually be worthless, if made without the due precautions.
So, rather than take their word for it, one should measure the verification strip and see whether the "proof" is ACTUALLY a PROOF (and exactly for which print condition), as claimed.
If you don't have a suitable measurement instrument, it would be good to borrow or buy one (an i1iSiS2XL, or an i1Pro, for example), and measure the control strip in M1 inside Curve4. Then it will be clear what print condition is being matched, if any at all (I wouldn't be surprised to find out that it matches none of them).
"Alpha_Gracol_G7" sounds like a very dubious and poorly-stated "print condition" anyway: no print professional would just ask you to match "GRACoL" or "G7" (the confusion between the two is telling, by the way) without specifying exactly which print condition is to matched that falls under the "GRACoL" classification.
I would suggest that you stick to the facts as you are able to determine them, and proceed from that. Measure the control strip, see how close the measurements come to any known print condition that would qualify as "GRACoL", then, if there is no match, send a message stating those facts. Pure and simple. No emotions, no frustration, just the facts - as that TV show used to put it.
Cheers.
------------------------------
Marco Ugolini
Print and Color Specialist, G7 Expert
Original Message:
Sent: 04-29-2021 12:22 PM
From: Jesse Pena
Subject: Customer Supplied Proof
We recently took a job where the proof was supplied to us by a third party. They said we had to match their proof, which in my experience has never been good. So of course once we were on press the print did not match the proof.
We use GRACoL 2006 and G7 on all of our press profiles. The proof they supplied said it was from an Epson P9000 with a tag that read "Alpha_Gracol_G7." Now I realize it doesn't mention what version of GRACoL, but does anyone know what "Alpha" could be. I'm just trying to understand why their proof is so far off from our print as I have never seen this before. I could not read their control strip either as the aperture is too big on my eXact.
I realize there are a lot of variables here. Thanks in advance.
------------------------------
Jesse Pena G7 Professional
Pre-Press
M.A.S Industries, Inc.
Plymouth WI
(920) 892-7100
------------------------------